<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freaky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2006/02/freaky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2006/02/freaky/</link>
	<description>Jamie's thoughts, ideas, musings and utter drivel.  Procrastination with a purpose!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:49:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: i5m</title>
		<link>http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2006/02/freaky/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>i5m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamie.ideasasylum.com/testblog/?p=809#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Just make them up like in the &quot;Real World&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In engineering I&#039;ve spent time doing this analysis. Initially it looked promising; I got results.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But then I started trying to validate it and couldn&#039;t. So I started tweaking my model and hit the wall. No matter what I did I couldn&#039;t validate it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So I give in an start writing a report stating that the analysis had failed.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, since this is the &quot;Real world&quot; it&#039;s simply not possible to spend all that time and get nothing out of it so I&#039;ve been told to re-write my report so it includes results. Even though I can&#039;t validate those results. Stupid. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So there you go, it doesn&#039;t matter. Just make stuff up and quote it against a confidence value of 0%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just make them up like in the &#8220;Real World&#8221;.</p>
<p>In engineering I&#8217;ve spent time doing this analysis. Initially it looked promising; I got results.</p>
<p>But then I started trying to validate it and couldn&#8217;t. So I started tweaking my model and hit the wall. No matter what I did I couldn&#8217;t validate it.</p>
<p>So I give in an start writing a report stating that the analysis had failed.</p>
<p>However, since this is the &#8220;Real world&#8221; it&#8217;s simply not possible to spend all that time and get nothing out of it so I&#8217;ve been told to re-write my report so it includes results. Even though I can&#8217;t validate those results. Stupid. </p>
<p>So there you go, it doesn&#8217;t matter. Just make stuff up and quote it against a confidence value of 0%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

