<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Demise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2008/08/googles-demise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2008/08/googles-demise/</link>
	<description>Jamie's thoughts, ideas, musings and utter drivel.  Procrastination with a purpose!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:49:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopeless</title>
		<link>http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2008/08/googles-demise/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>hopeless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2008/08/googles-demise/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the title is pure bait but I wrote it off the top of my head late last night.  It&#039;s just as likely that Google will come up with something new.  They&#039;ve got plenty of smart people.  This was just my observation that a) links are no longer rare and therefore have lost a lot of their value and b) the links people are actually using are the one Google is now ignoring.  That doesn&#039;t bode well.

The recent Cuil fail was particularly fun to watch though.  Even more interesting was Yuil/&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.4hoursearch.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;4hoursearch&lt;/a&gt;: a Cuil-clone built upon Yahoo! search results (in 4 hours apparently) which was far superior to Cuil&#039;s results. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the title is pure bait but I wrote it off the top of my head late last night.  It&#8217;s just as likely that Google will come up with something new.  They&#8217;ve got plenty of smart people.  This was just my observation that a) links are no longer rare and therefore have lost a lot of their value and b) the links people are actually using are the one Google is now ignoring.  That doesn&#8217;t bode well.</p>
<p>The recent Cuil fail was particularly fun to watch though.  Even more interesting was Yuil/<a href="http://www.4hoursearch.com" rel="nofollow">4hoursearch</a>: a Cuil-clone built upon Yahoo! search results (in 4 hours apparently) which was far superior to Cuil&#8217;s results. <img src='http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Browne</title>
		<link>http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2008/08/googles-demise/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>John Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 09:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2008/08/googles-demise/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Indeed google do alot more than search but search is what pays the bills. 
Googles search results are becoming less relevant all the time. They&#039;re great if you know what you&#039;re looking for and are very specific about it otherwise you just get half a page of adds and you tube and wiki fucking pedia links. 
I have my search page set to 100 cause you never find what you&#039;re looking for on the first one or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed google do alot more than search but search is what pays the bills.<br />
Googles search results are becoming less relevant all the time. They&#8217;re great if you know what you&#8217;re looking for and are very specific about it otherwise you just get half a page of adds and you tube and wiki fucking pedia links.<br />
I have my search page set to 100 cause you never find what you&#8217;re looking for on the first one or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i5m</title>
		<link>http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2008/08/googles-demise/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>i5m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamie.ideasasylum.com/2008/08/googles-demise/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>1) I thought you were going to bring up Cuil (not worth linking to). Thankfully you didn&#039;t. If there is a google killer out there then that&#039;s not it. But a bit of competition wouldn&#039;t hurt.

2) If google got surpassed in search is that the end? They do a lot more than search - they&#039;ve got their bases covered, me thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) I thought you were going to bring up Cuil (not worth linking to). Thankfully you didn&#8217;t. If there is a google killer out there then that&#8217;s not it. But a bit of competition wouldn&#8217;t hurt.</p>
<p>2) If google got surpassed in search is that the end? They do a lot more than search &#8211; they&#8217;ve got their bases covered, me thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

